Although it isn’t a pleasant subject, estate taxation will probably begin to seep into media coverage. Why? Because currently it is set to disappear entirely in 2010 only to return in 2011 with a 55% rate on the portion of estates over $1 million.
In 2009 the value of an inheritance shielded from taxation is $3.5 million with the excess taxed at a 45% rate. This is the next to last year of President George W. Bush’s 10-year $1.35 trillion across-the-board tax cut effecting estate taxation.
Politically speaking, President Obama has proposed permanently locking in the exclusion of $3.5 million and the current tax rate of 45%. Congressional Republicans favor a full repeal. The central players on estate tax policy are currently preoccupied with the health care debate: Senate Finance Chairman Max Baucus (D, Mont.) and House Ways and Means Chairman Charles B. Rangel (D, N.Y.). So, you can imagine that many different scenarios could play out.
Given all the issues facing our lawmakers and demanding their time, I would suspect the simplest route would be to fall back on a one year extension of the current rate and exemption. Then, it could be more adequately addressed next year.
Although I personally favor repeal, I’m reminded of the quote from Mark Bloomfield, president of the American Council for Capital Formation, “Those people who believe repeal of the estate tax will happen are probably more delirious than Ralph Nader thinking he could be president of the United States.”
Michael E. Bruder, CFP®, CTFA